ArticleOsteoarthritis and cartilage open2025
The evolution of the meniscus: Where surgical advancements meet translational research.
Article in Osteoarthritis and cartilage open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Complications and Reoperations Following Meniscal Repair and Transplantation.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2026Review
- Partial meniscus allograft transplantation preserving the recipient's anterior root: a comparative study in a rabbit model.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate key historical developments in meniscal pathobiology research and surgical advancements to capture pivotal moments in the evolution towards contemporary meniscus treatment. Design: We conducted a literature search in PubMed and Hollis, Harvard's online library database, to identify influential primary and secondary literature on meniscus form, function, and surgical techniques. Primary sources generally consisted of case reports or research investigations, while secondary sources included literature reviews. We used these sources to create a chronology of research findings, highlighting periods of controversy, shifts in opinion, and technological innovation. Results: The meniscus was considered a functionless, vestigial structure for most of modern history until research in the mid-1940s identified significant degenerative changes among patients following total meniscectomy. Interest in the meniscus surged following this discovery, spurring investigations that broadened scientific understanding of the vasculature, neuroanatomy, and biochemical composition of the meniscus. In turn, these findings altered treatment practices in favor of meniscal preservation and stimulated research into the implications of altered hoop tension and meniscus vascularity. Conclusions: The history and advancement of meniscal surgery has and continues to be shaped by translational research that has broadened scientific understanding of the form and function of the meniscus. We demonstrate that advancements in surgical techniques addressing meniscal tears were preceded by translational research that broadened understanding of the form and function of the meniscus. Future meniscal research should continue to utilize both translational and clinical findings to optimize meniscal tear treatment methodologies, while also minimizing risk of osteoarthritis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.