ArticleSleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society2025
Sleep restriction impairs item memory discrimination but not general recognition in young adolescents.
Article in Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Festschrift in honor of Dr. Robert Stickgold, pioneer in sleep, memory, and dream research.Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Study Objectives: The impact of sleep loss on memory encoding is well described in adults, yet less understood in youth, despite the prevalence and educational relevance of adolescent sleep loss. Here, we implement at-home sleep restriction in youth ages 10-14 and a well-validated hippocampus-dependent learning task to elucidate how real-world levels of sleep loss affect distinct memory encoding processes at this young age. Methods: A within-subject cross-over design involved five nights of at-home sleep restriction (7.5 h in bed) compared to sleep optimization (10 h in bed). Restriction was achieved by delaying bedtime and advancing risetime equally. All sleep was monitored with wrist actigraphy, sleep diaries, and daily calls to the laboratory. Testing involved the validated Mnemonic Similarity Task (MST), which can distinguish between two components of successful memory encoding: general memory recognition for old items and "lure discrimination," a hippocampus-dependent ability to distinguish similar yet distinct items. Results: As estimated by actigraphy, our manipulation reduced sleep by 1.4 ± 0.48 h per night for five nights. This reduction resulted in a selective deficit in MST-indexed memory encoding; we observed a decrease in lure discrimination (i.e. the ability to distinguish highly similar items), but no impact on recognition of old items. Conclusions: We present evidence that low levels of sleep loss for five nights (typical of a school week) are sufficient to alter memory encoding in youth. We interpret these data in the context of classroom-based learning and speculate that reduced lure discrimination may yield memory that is less capable of distinguishing closely related facts and concepts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.