ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical policy and practice2025
Mechanisms influencing generic drug substitution behavior under the national centralized drug procurement policy.
Article in Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: As a key component of China's healthcare reform, the national centralized drug procurement (NCDP) policy has significantly influenced physician behavior regarding generic substitution. Therefore, it is essential to investigate the mechanisms underlying physicians' decisions to prescribe bid-winning generics under the NCDP, to provide empirical evidence for policy optimization, and to support the broader implementation of generic substitution strategies. Methods: Drawing upon the theory of planned behavior (TPB), a conceptual model was developed, and a corresponding scale was constructed. Structural equation modelling (SEM) was employed to examine the influencing mechanisms, focusing on the relationships among subjective attitude, subjective norms, perceived behavioral control, subjective willingness, and actual prescribing behavior. Results: The findings indicated that subjective attitude was the primary driver of physicians' intentions to prescribe bid-winning generics. Subjective norms did not exert a statistically significant effect on prescribing willingness, while perceived behavioral control was found to have a negative influence on intention and minimal impact on actual substitution behavior. Subjective willingness has emerged as a critical mediating factor that directly shapes physicians' substitution behavior. Conclusion: This study highlights the importance of enhancing physicians' positive attitudes towards bid-winning generics, fostering a supportive normative environment, and mitigating excessive perceived behavioral control. These strategies may strengthen prescribing intentions, support effective and sustainable implementation of the NCDP, promote generic substitution, and reduce patients' medication costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.