Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40933974›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of medical sciences2025

Different local anesthetic volumes in pericapsular nerve group block for hip fracture patients.

Yusuf Özgüner, Savaş Altinsoy, Gökçen Kültüroğlu, Sevda Gökçe Gürpinar, Derya Özkan, Jülide Ergil, Erbil Aydin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of medical sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yusuf ÖzgünerDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Ankara Etlik City Hospital, Ankara, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9629-0246
Savaş AltinsoyDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Ankara Etlik City Hospital, Ankara, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3588-7145
Gökçen KültüroğluDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Ankara Etlik City Hospital, Ankara, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3481-5518
Sevda Gökçe GürpinarDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Ankara Etlik City Hospital, Ankara, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0863-7711
Derya ÖzkanDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Ankara Etlik City Hospital, Ankara, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8964-3015
Jülide ErgilDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Ankara Etlik City Hospital, Ankara, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4580-7866
Erbil AydinDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Ankara Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1187-0744

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background/aim: The pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block is an effective method for pain management in patients with hip fractures. In our study, we compared three different local anesthetic volumes of the PENG block in patients who underwent surgery for hip fracture. Materials and methods: Patients who underwent surgery with spinal anesthesia for intertrochanteric femur fractures (60 patients) were divided into three groups based on the volume of local anesthetic administered: Group 1 (20 mL), Group 2 (30 mL), and Group 3 (40 mL). Postoperative patient-controlled analgesia was initiated. Postoperative tramadol consumption, rest and movement pain scores, and the duration of motor block were monitored. Results: We found that Group 2 (118 ± 35.48 mg) and Group 3 (115 ± 42.98 mg) had reduced tramadol consumption compared to Group 1 (151 ± 31.43 mg) (p < 0.05). However, Group 3 (161 ± 18.6 min) had a longer duration of motor block (time to reach a Bromage score of 0) compared to Group 1 (132.25 ± 13.71 min) and Group 2 (143.5 ± 19.54 min) (p < 0.05). Conclusion: We found that the 30 mL and 40 mL volumes in the PENG block resulted in lower tramadol consumption compared to the 20 mL volume. We believe that the 30 mL volume is the most appropriate option among the three volumes, as it provides similar analgesic efficacy to the 40 mL volume but causes less motor block.

Indexed as

Anesthetics, LocalHip FracturesNerve BlockPostoperative PainAgedAged, 80 and overAnalgesia, Patient-ControlledAnalgesics, OpioidAnesthesia, SpinalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain ManagementPain MeasurementTramadolAnalgesics, OpioidAnesthetics, LocalTramadolHip fracturespain managementpericapsular nerve group blockregional anesthesia

Identifiers

PMID40933974
PMCPMC12419048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.