ArticleTurkish journal of medical sciences2025
Different local anesthetic volumes in pericapsular nerve group block for hip fracture patients.
Article in Turkish journal of medical sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/aim: The pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block is an effective method for pain management in patients with hip fractures. In our study, we compared three different local anesthetic volumes of the PENG block in patients who underwent surgery for hip fracture. Materials and methods: Patients who underwent surgery with spinal anesthesia for intertrochanteric femur fractures (60 patients) were divided into three groups based on the volume of local anesthetic administered: Group 1 (20 mL), Group 2 (30 mL), and Group 3 (40 mL). Postoperative patient-controlled analgesia was initiated. Postoperative tramadol consumption, rest and movement pain scores, and the duration of motor block were monitored. Results: We found that Group 2 (118 ± 35.48 mg) and Group 3 (115 ± 42.98 mg) had reduced tramadol consumption compared to Group 1 (151 ± 31.43 mg) (p < 0.05). However, Group 3 (161 ± 18.6 min) had a longer duration of motor block (time to reach a Bromage score of 0) compared to Group 1 (132.25 ± 13.71 min) and Group 2 (143.5 ± 19.54 min) (p < 0.05). Conclusion: We found that the 30 mL and 40 mL volumes in the PENG block resulted in lower tramadol consumption compared to the 20 mL volume. We believe that the 30 mL volume is the most appropriate option among the three volumes, as it provides similar analgesic efficacy to the 40 mL volume but causes less motor block.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.