Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40933954›Full record

ReviewEXCLI journal2025

Demystifying the power of essential oils: a review of their antibacterial properties and potential as natural food preservatives.

Hanen Falleh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EXCLI journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Integrated Evaluation ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Hanen FallehLaboratory of Aromatic and Medicinal Plant, Center of Biotechnology of Borj Cedria, BP 901, Hammam-Lif 2050, Tunisia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review delves into the antimicrobial potential of essential oils (EOs), focusing on their mechanisms of action against foodborne pathogens and their applications as natural food preservatives. EOs, derived from aromatic plants, are complex mixtures of volatile compounds, primarily terpenes, terpenoids, and phenolic compounds, which exhibit potent antimicrobial properties. These bioactive compounds disrupt bacterial cell membranes, increase permeability, and induce leakage of intracellular components, leading to cell death. Additionally, EOs inhibit energy production by depleting ATP levels, disrupting the tricarboxylic acid cycle, and impairing cellular respiration. They also generate reactive oxygen species (ROS), causing oxidative stress and damaging bacterial DNA, proteins, and lipids. Furthermore, EOs interfere with quorum sensing and biofilm formation, reducing bacterial virulence and resistance. Despite their efficacy, challenges such as strong flavors, poor solubility, and environmental sensitivity limit their direct application. To address these issues, encapsulation techniques, such as nanoemulsions and active packaging, have been developed to enhance the stability and controlled release of EOs. For instance, nanoencapsulation of thyme and cinnamon EOs has significantly improved their antimicrobial efficacy in food products like milk and minced meat. By harnessing the multifaceted mechanisms of EOs, this review underscores their potential as sustainable and effective natural preservatives to combat foodborne pathogens and improve food safety. See also the graphical abstract(Fig. 1).

Indexed as

Antimicrobial mechanismsEncapsulation techniquesEssential oilsFoodborne pathogensNatural food preservatives

Identifiers

PMID40933954
PMCPMC12419452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.