ArticleWorld journal of clinical cases2025
Prolonged retention of oil-based iodinated contrast medium observed on plain abdominal radiograph after cesarean section: A case report.
Article in World journal of clinical cases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOil-based iodinated contrast media have excellent contrast properties and are widely used for hysterosalpingographic evaluation of female infertility. On abdominal radiography and computed tomography (CT) scans, their radiodensity is similar to that of metallic objects, which can sometimes lead to diagnostic confusion in the postoperative settings. In this case, retained oil-based contrast medium was observed on an abdominal radiograph following a cesarean section, making it difficult to differentiate from an intraperitoneal foreign body from surgery. CASE SUMMARY: The patient was a 37-year-old pregnant woman who was referred to our hospital at 32 weeks and 1 day of pregnancy due to complete placenta previa for management of pregnancy and delivery. An elective cesarean section was performed at 37 weeks and 3 days. A plain abdominal radiograph taken immediately after surgery revealed a near-round, hyperdense, mass-like shadow with a regular margin in the pelvic cavity. An intraperitoneal foreign body was suspected; therefore, an abdominal CT scan was performed. The foreign body was located on the left side of the pouch of Douglas and had a CT value of 7000 Hounsfield units, similar to that of metals. The CT value strongly suggested the presence of an artificial object. However, further inquiries with the patient and her previous physician revealed a history of hysterosalpingography. Accordingly, retained oil-based iodinated contrast medium was suspected, and observation of the object's course was adopted.
conclusionWhen intraperitoneal foreign bodies are suspected on postoperative radiographs, the possibility of oil-based iodinated contrast medium retention should be considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.