ReviewFrontiers in oncology2025
Research advances in immune agonists and their nanoparticles for enhancing the immunotherapeutic efficacy of PD-1 inhibitors in malignancies.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Immunoregulatory strategies of MOF-based nanodrug delivery systems: Advances in cancer therapy applications and future perspectives.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- Metal-phenolic networks: a promising strategy for cancer immunotherapy.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Pathobiology and clinical significance of malignant pleural effusions.EMBO molecular medicine · 2026Review
- Recent advances in nanoparticles-based sonodynamic and immune checkpoint blockade synergistic therapy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.Materials today. Bio · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB), particularly targeting programmed cell death-1 (PD-1), has revolutionized cancer immunotherapy but remains limited by heterogeneous therapeutic responses and immune-related toxicities. This review systematically examines the integration of immune agonists-STING, TLR, CD40, and OX40 agonists-with PD-1 inhibitors to overcome resistance and amplify antitumor immunity. Nanoparticle delivery systems emerge as transformative platforms, addressing critical limitations of free agonists, including enzymatic degradation, off-target toxicity, and poor pharmacokinetics. By leveraging tunable physicochemical properties (e.g., size, surface charge, stimuli-responsive release), nanoparticles enhance tumor-specific accumulation, prolong agonist half-life, and synergize with PD-1 inhibitors to remodel immunosuppressive microenvironments. Preclinical and early clinical studies demonstrate combinatorial strategies achieving increases in T cell infiltration and enhancements in anti-angiogenic activity compared to monotherapies. However, translational challenges persist, including nanoparticle-induced immunotoxicity (ROS-mediated inflammation), manufacturing scalability hurdles, and interspecies discrepancies in murine models. Future directions emphasize personalized nanovaccines, supramolecular cytosolic delivery systems (e.g., Calix-STING), and biomarker-driven trials to optimize efficacy in advanced pancreatic, melanoma, and immunologically quiescent tumors. This work underscores the imperative for interdisciplinary collaboration to standardize nanoparticle design and clinical validation frameworks, ultimately bridging the gap between nanomedicine innovation and oncology practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.