ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2025
Low-Density Lipoprotein and High-Density Lipoprotein as Biomarkers for Inflammatory Bowel Disease Activity Assessment.
Article in International journal of general medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To explore the correlation of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) with inflammatory bowel disease activity and their value in predicting disease activity. Patients and methods: Clinical data of 490 adult IBD patients diagnosed in two IBD centers were collected, and 200 healthy people were served as controls. To evaluate the correlation of IDL and HDL with clinical and endoscopic activity of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and to explore the predictive value of them for disease activity. Results: In CD, there were differences in HDL, CRP and ESR levels (p<0.001) among different disease activity groups. HDL levels were negatively correlated with HBI and CDEIS. In UC, there were differences in LDL, HDL, CRP and ESR levels among groups with different disease activities (p<0.001). Both LDL and HDL levels were negatively correlated with Mayo clinical score and UCEIS (p<0.001). The sensitivity of LDL for predicting moderate-severe UC was slightly higher than CRP (65.65% vs 60.31%). The specificity of HDL in predicting moderate-severe CD (65.85% vs 52.44%) and UC (87.34% vs 79.75%) was higher than CRP. Conclusion: In patients with IBD, serum levels of both LDL and HDL were significantly lower compared to healthy controls. These levels correlated with disease activity. Furthermore, LDL and HDL levels demonstrated potential utility in distinguishing patients with moderate-severe IBD and show promise as monitoring biomarkers for IBD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.