Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40933763›Full record

ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2025

Predicting 28-Day Mortality in Critically Ill Patients Receiving Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: A Novel Interpretable Machine Learning Approach.

Tao Zhang, Zi-Han Nan, Xiao-Xuan Fan, Jing-Xiao Pang, Cong-Cong Zhao, Yan Xin, Zhen-Jie Hu, Shao-Han Guo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tao Zhang *Department of Intensive Care Unit, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, 050000, People's Republic of China.
Zi-Han Nan *Department of Intensive Care Unit, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, 050000, People's Republic of China.
Xiao-Xuan FanDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, 050000, People's Republic of China.
Jing-Xiao PangDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, 050000, People's Republic of China.
Cong-Cong ZhaoDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, 050000, People's Republic of China.
Yan XinDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, The Third Hospital of Shijiazhuang, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, 050000, People's Republic of China.
Zhen-Jie HuDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, 050000, People's Republic of China.
Shao-Han GuoDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, 050000, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to develop and validate an interpretable machine learning (ML) model to predict 28-day all-cause mortality in critically ill patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), facilitating early risk stratification and clinical decision-making. Patients and Methods: Data from 1362 CRRT patients were analyzed, including 1224 from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV database (training cohort) and 138 from a Chinese hospital (external validation cohort). Feature selection was performed using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, support vector machine-recursive feature elimination, and Boruta algorithms. Nine machine learning models were constructed and compared, including Gaussian process (GP), ensemble methods (gradient boosting machine and eXtreme gradient boosting), and other classifiers. Model performance was assessed via the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), decision curve analysis, and other metrics. The SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) method was used to interpret the ML models. Results: The GP model demonstrated consistent predictive performance across all cohorts, with training (AUC=0.841, accuracy=76.8%, sensitivity=65.5%), internal validation (AUC=0.794, accuracy=73.4%, sensitivity=60.0%), and external validation (AUC=0.780, accuracy=63.8%, sensitivity=39.0%) sets. Key predictors included red cell distribution width, age, lactate, septic shock, and vasoactive drug use. SHAP analysis provided transparent insights into feature contributions. Conclusion: The GP-based model accurately predicts 28-day mortality in CRRT patients and demonstrates strong generalizability. By integrating SHAP explanations, it offers clinicians an interpretable tool to identify high-risk patients early, potentially improving outcomes.

Indexed as

critical illnessexternal validationGaussian processinterpretabilitymachine learningMIMIC-IV databasemortality predictionSHAP

Identifiers

PMID40933763
PMCPMC12419209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.