ArticleJournal of intensive medicine2025
The association of fluid balance with traumatic brain injury outcomes: A systematic review.
Article in Journal of intensive medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Fluid therapy in traumatic brain injury with the resuscitation, optimization, stabilization, and evacuation (ROSE) concept approach.Critical care science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Fluid balance management is critical in moderate and severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) due to impaired cerebrovascular autoregulation. This study systematically reviews the association of fluid volume management with outcomes in moderate to severe TBI. Methods: We conducted a systematic literature search on MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, The Cochrane Database, and bibliographies of included articles. Studies assessing fluid volume management and outcomes in moderate/severe TBI patients were included. Risk of bias, publication bias, and heterogeneity were comprehensively assessed. Primary outcomes were short/long-term mortality and neurological outcomes. Secondary outcomes included the effect on intracranial pressure, development of acute kidney injury (AKI), refractory intracranial hypertension (RIH), pulmonary edema/acute respiratory distress syndrome, length of stay, and length of mechanical ventilation. Fluid balance groups were categorized into restrictive, euvolemic, and liberal. Results: Out of 2668 studies identified, 12 studies (seven observational and five randomized controlled trials [RCTs]) involving 9184 TBI patients were included. Euvolemic fluid balance was associated with lower odds of mortality compared to restrictive (odds ratio [OR] = 0.39, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.27 to 0.57, Conclusions: Euvolemic fluid balance may improve key outcomes in TBI patients, including reduced mortality and better neurological outcomes. These findings underscore the need for RCTs to further assess euvolemic fluid management protocols in neurocritical care and their potential to inform clinical guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.