Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40933701›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in pediatrics2025

Biomarker for renal scarring screening in children with vesicoureteral reflux: a systematic review.

Utari Mudhia Arisa Putri, Putu Angga Risky Raharja, Gerhard Reinaldi Situmorang, Irfan Wahyudi, Arry Rodjani, Henny Adriani Puspitasari, Abubakr Imam, Luis R Saraiva, Santiago Vallasciani, Tariq O Abbas

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Utari Mudhia Arisa PutriUrology Department, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital/Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Putu Angga Risky RaharjaUrology Department, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital/Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Gerhard Reinaldi SitumorangUrology Department, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital/Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Irfan WahyudiUrology Department, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital/Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Arry RodjaniUrology Department, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital/Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Henny Adriani PuspitasariUrology Department, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital/Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Abubakr ImamPediatric Nephrology Division, Sidra Medicine, Doha, Qatar.
Luis R SaraivaTranslational Medicine Division, Research Branch, Sidra Medicine, Doha, Qatar.
Santiago VallascianiUrology Division, Sidra Medicine, Doha, Qatar.
Tariq O AbbasUrology Division, Sidra Medicine, Doha, Qatar.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is a prevalent pediatric urological condition that increases children's risk of urinary tract infections (UTIs) and renal damage. Renal scarring linked to VUR can lead to long-term complications, including hypertension and chronic kidney disease (CKD). Although traditional imaging techniques, such as dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) scans, are regarded as the gold standard for identifying renal scarring, they come with risks of radiation exposure and high costs. This review investigates the diagnostic accuracy of blood and urine biomarkers as alternative methods for detecting renal scarring in VUR. Methods: This systematic review adhered to the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. We conducted a comprehensive search across three databases-PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Cochrane-for studies on biomarkers associated with renal scarring in children with VUR. The included studies were evaluated for diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity and specificity) and assessed for risk of bias using the QUADAS-2 framework. Results: Nine studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in the qualitative synthesis. Biomarkers such as NGAL, CRP, CXCL8/IL-8, LL-37, and IL-6 were evaluated. Among these, urinary NGAL demonstrated the best diagnostic performance, with sensitivity ranging from 72%-84% and specificity between 60% and 81%. Other biomarkers exhibited moderate accuracy, although they were less reliable than NGAL. Overall, biomarkers present a promising non-invasive alternative to traditional imaging for detecting renal scarring in children with VUR. Conclusion: Urinary biomarkers, particularly NGAL, hold potential for detecting VUR and renal scarring in children, providing a non-invasive alternative to traditional imaging methods. However, additional validation and standardization are necessary before these biomarkers can be routinely applied in clinical practice.

Indexed as

biomarkersNGALrenal scarringsystematic reviewvesicoureteral reflux

Identifiers

PMID40933701
PMCPMC12417132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.