Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40933660›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology science

Open-Source Periorbital Segmentation Dataset for Ophthalmic Applications.

George R Nahass, Emma Koehler, Nicholas Tomaras, Danny Lopez, Madison Cheung, Alexander Palacios, Jeffrey C Peterson, Sasha Hubschman, Kelsey Green, Chad A Purnell and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

George R NahassDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Illinois Chicago College of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Emma KoehlerDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Illinois Chicago College of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Nicholas TomarasDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Illinois Chicago College of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Danny LopezDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Illinois Chicago College of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Madison CheungDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Alexander PalaciosDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Jeffrey C PetersonDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Illinois Chicago College of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Sasha HubschmanDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Illinois Chicago College of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Kelsey GreenDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Chad A PurnellDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Pete SetabutrDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Illinois Chicago College of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Ann Q TranDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Illinois Chicago College of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Darvin YiDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Illinois Chicago College of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to create and validate a dataset for oculoplastic segmentation and periorbital distance prediction. Design: This was an experimental study. Subjects: Images of faces from 2 open-source datasets were included in this study. Methods: The images were sourced from 2 open-source datasets and cropped to include only the eyes. All images had the iris, sclera, lid, caruncle, and brow segmented by 5 trained annotators. Intergrader reliability analysis was done by having 5 annotators annotate the same 100 images randomly selected after at least a 2-week forgetting period. Intragrader analysis was done by having 5 annotators annotate the same 20 images after a 2-week forgetting period. Three DeepLabV3 segmentation models were trained for segmentation using the datasets following standard procedures. Main Outcome Measures: The quality of the annotations was evaluated by Dice score through intragrader and intergrader experiments. Segmentation models were trained to demonstrate the dataset's utility for deep learning. The Dice score was used to evaluate deep learning models. Results: We annotated 2842 images. Agreement between annotators (intergrader) on a randomly selected subset of 100 images was very high, with an average Dice score of 0.82 ± 0.01. Intragrader analysis also demonstrates that the same grader accurately reproduces annotations with an average Dice score, across all classes, of 0.81 ± 0.08. The average Dice score across all classes of a segmentation network trained on the Chicago Facial dataset, the CelebAMask-HQ dataset, and both combined was 0.90 ± 0.11, 0.81 ± 0.20, and 0.84 ± 0.18, respectively. Conclusions: We have developed a first-of-its-kind dataset for use in oculoplastic and craniofacial segmentation tasks. All the annotations are publicly available for free download. Having access to segmentation datasets designed specifically for oculoplastic surgery will permit more rapid development of clinically useful segmentation networks that can be leveraged for periorbital distance prediction and other downstream tasks. In addition to the annotations, we also provide an open-source toolkit for periorbital distance prediction from segmentation masks, which are available via an application programming interface. The weights of all models have also been open-sourced and are publicly available for use by the community. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceComputer VisionDatasetsOculoplastic surgeryOpen source

Identifiers

PMID40933660
PMCPMC12417369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.