ArticleFrontiers in dental medicine2025
Cyclic fatigue resistance of a blue heat-treated engine-driven file with different angles of canal access using different kinematics; an
Article in Frontiers in dental medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of bending test, cyclic fatigue, and buckling resistance test using rotary Nickel-Titanium files of three types: AnJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2026Article
- Mechanical and elemental comparison of EndoStar and One Curve nickel-titanium endodontic files: AnJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the effect of angle of access and kinematics on the dynamic cyclic fatigue resistance of E3 Azure rotary NiTi files at body temperature. Methods: Eighty E3 Azure files, 25/06, were randomly divided into two equal groups according to the kinematics used, rotation, and reciprocation. Each group was further divided into two equal subgroups ( Results: Samples instrumented using reciprocation motion had significantly higher time to fracture than those with continuous rotation ( Conclusion: The motion and the angle of file access significantly influence the cyclic fatigue resistance of E3 Azure files. Reciprocation motion and a smaller angle of access improve the fatigue resistance of E3 Azure files. Clinical relevance: Reciprocation motion and establishment of straight-line access enhance the safety and efficiency of E3 Azure files.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.