Article3D printing and additive manufacturing2025
Performance of Fused Deposition Modeling 3D Printed Fabric with Different Structures.
Article in 3D printing and additive manufacturing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
3D printed fashion products have become a trend. This article explains use of fused deposition modeling technology for 3D printing of fabrics with thermoplastic polyurethane flexible filament. A total of 15 structures of fabric were designed and printed for fabric performance tests. The fabric structures were "woven-like." Those fabrics were printed by 0.8, 1.0, and 1.5 mm nozzles, separately. Meanwhile, the fabrics had various layer heights, but total thickness of the fabric was fixed at 0.6 mm. The strongest fabric could resist up to 460 N in ball burst test. In tensile test, the strongest fabric was broken at 230 N and maximum elongation was 647% at break. Besides, the failure performance was analyzed, recovery ability of fabric was also evaluated. The least deformation of the fabric was 2.5% after stretching with 60 N and releasing for five cycles. These results of the fabric performance could be a database and a reference for designing the structure of an apparel or a garment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.