Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40933534›Full record

ArticleLanguage and linguistics compass

The Neural Network for Sign Language Comprehension.

Brennan Terhune-Cotter, Karen Emmorey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Language and linguistics compass. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Cortical tracking of sign language: The role of language knowledge in tracking of different articulators.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Brennan Terhune-CotterJoint Doctoral Program in Language and Communicative Disorders, San Diego State University, University of California, San Diego, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4325-2753
Karen EmmoreySchool of Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences, San Diego State University, San Diego, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5647-0066

Funding

Language, Modality and the BrainR01DC010997 · NIDCD · SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI KAREN EMMOREY · 2010 to 2026
$8.6M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC010997
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sign languages differ dramatically from spoken languages in their linguistic articulators (the hands/face vs. the vocal tract) and in how they are perceived (visually vs. auditorily), which can impact how they are processed in the brain. This review focuses on the neural network involved in sign language comprehension, from processing the initial visual input to parsing meaningful sentences. We describe how the signer's brain decodes the visual signed signal into distinct and linguistically relevant representations (e.g., handshapes and movements) primarily in occipital and posterior temporal regions. These representations are converted into stable sign-based phonological representations in posterior temporal and parietal regions, which activate lexical-semantic representations. The higher-level processes which create combinatorial semantic-syntactic constructions from these lexical representations are subserved by a frontotemporal network of regions which overlaps with the network for spoken languages. The broad outline of this network is partially specific to the visual modality and partially supramodal in nature. Important avenues for future research include identifying and characterising patterns of activation and connectivity within macroanatomical regions which appear to serve multiple functional roles in sign language comprehension.

Indexed as

bilingualismcognitive science of languagedeafnessneurolinguisticsperceptionsign language comprehensionsupramodal languagevariation

Identifiers

PMID40933534
PMCPMC12419533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.