ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2025
Assessing veterinary education outcomes in livestock systems: a quasi-experimental study of scientific buffalo husbandry training.
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Scientific buffalo husbandry management practices play a pivotal role in enhancing rural livelihoods and milk productivity in India. Despite widespread training initiatives, there is limited empirical evidence quantifying the cognitive impact of such programs on smallholder farmers. This study, grounded in Adult Learning Theory (Andragogy), adopted a quasi-experimental one-group pre-test-post-test design involving 518 farmers trained at the Indian Council of Agricultural Research-Central Institute for Research on Buffaloes (ICAR-CIRB). A validated 15-item knowledge test was used to assess learning across five thematic domains: breeding, feeding and nutrition, animal health, milk quality, and milk marketing. The training intervention resulted in a substantial improvement in farmers' knowledge, as evidenced by both absolute and normalized learning gains. Subject-wise analysis revealed feeding and nutrition as the most improved domain, followed by milk marketing and breeding. Multiple linear regression analysis identified specific socio-demographic and experiential factors-such as gender, livestock holding, and prior experience-as significant predictors of knowledge gain, while age and baseline knowledge showed negative associations. Disaggregated profiling further showed that young, moderately experienced female farmers with medium-to-large herd sizes achieved the highest learning gains. These findings suggest that training outcomes vary considerably across learner profiles and subject areas. The study highlights the importance of targeted, learner-sensitive extension models not only for enhancing knowledge transfer, but also for promoting the adoption of best practices, and for enabling systematic monitoring and evaluation of how the trained subject matter areas are implemented at the field level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.