ReviewFrontiers in global women's health2025
Radical care: voetvroue and the reclamation of pleasure in reproductive health.
Review in Frontiers in global women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Obstetric violence, rooted in the racialised and gendered logics of colonial medicine, has long served as a tool for disciplining reproductive bodies. In both 19th-century Antebellum slavery and the Cape colony, Black women's bodies became sites of medical experimentation, regulation, and control. Gynaecology emerged as a site of race-making, displacing Black autonomous midwives and erasing their knowledge from official medical archives. Yet this erasure was never complete. In Eldorado Park, Black autonomous midwives, or voetvroue, have cultivated grounded, place-based forms of reproductive care: treating infertility, facilitating births, and enacting rituals transmitted along familial and communal lines. Drawing on archival research and life history interviews, this paper traces the erasure of "voetvroue", or Black autonomous midwives, from the medical archive and discusses the colonial transformation of birth and obstetrics into a site of surveillance, control, and violence. It follows the lives of three voetvroue-Aunty Faeeza, Aunt Rose, and their grandmother, Ouma-who re-fashioned her two-bedroom backroom in Eldorado Park into a birthing space, or "hospitaal". I argue that the huis-hospitaal constitutes a radical commons of care that offers a counter-space to colonial biomedical logics not through overt refusal but through the everyday enactment of pleasure, dignity, and agency. Here, pleasure is conceptualised as emotional, spiritual, and relational: a mode of re-imagining reproductive justice beyond the confines of state-sanctioned care. By reframing reproductive health through the lens of radical care, voetvroue reclaim space, knowledge, and autonomy for Black birthing women in the face of ongoing racial-capitalist violence. In doing so, they revalorise locale-specific modes of knowledge and technologies and prioritise holistic approaches to birthing care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.