Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40933511›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in global women's health2025

Doctors' experiences on dealing with informed consent required for lifesaving interventions for pregnant women in Somalia.

Ahmed Aweis, Machunde Mauma, Abdulkadir Aweis, Abdulkadir Afrah, Ibraahim Abdullahi Guled, Asli Kulane

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in global women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ahmed AweisDepartment of Public Health, Capital University, Mogadishu, Somalia.
Machunde MaumaDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Abdulkadir AweisDepartment of Research, Bidhaamiye Centre for Social Development and Rebuilding, Mogadishu, Somalia.
Abdulkadir AfrahDepartment of Education & Research, Somali Maternal and Child Health Research Institute, Mogadishu, Somalia.
Ibraahim Abdullahi GuledDepartment of Pediatrics, Somalia National University, Mogadishu, Somalia.
Asli KulaneDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Informed consent is a crucial legal and ethical requirement in the physician-patient relationship for all aspects of care. Despite, patients have the right to make their own decision in health, women in the Middle East and Africa, including Somalia, often have limited autonomy in healthcare decisions due to patriarchal structures. In Somalia, male family members including husbands frequently hold the ultimate authority in women's healthcare choices, sometimes restricting access to lifesaving sexual and reproductive health services. Purpose: To explore doctors' experiences of delay or refusal to provide consent for lifesaving interventions for pregnant women in Somalia. Patients and methods: an exploratory, qualitative design. Purposive sampling was used to select doctors working in maternity wards in the five selected hospitals. A total of 22 medical doctors were interviewed using a semi structured interview guide, and the data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results: An overarching theme emerged: "The disconnect between healthcare system and patriarchy system" with five sub-themes namely: (1) Consent is given only by paternal male family members (2) Paternal and male witnesses signatures required for the consent form (3) Paternal male conflicts and other reasons for delaying or refusing consent (4) Potential consequences for the doctors without the consent of paternal male (5) Changing the consent guidelines from paternal male dependency. Consent of the pregnant women is given by paternal male family members since they are responsible for her life (blood/ Conclusion: This study revealed that doctors require protection when performing their duties. All doctors who participated in the study were ready to save the lives of their patients, but were assured of their safety. Patients seem to cooperate with doctors, but the cultural practices of providing consent from male members remain a challenge to the intervention. A national health policy should be drafted and approved by the cabinet that grant women the sole right to consent to life-saving medical interventions. Additionally, community mobilization is needed to educate community leaders about the negative impact of delaying or denying women informed consent to essential healthcare due to the patriarchal norms.

Indexed as

consentcultural modelcultural practicesmale paternal members of the familypregnant women

Identifiers

PMID40933511
PMCPMC12417481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.