ReviewNeurology. Genetics2025
Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Diagnosis, Management, and Surveillance of
Review in Neurology. Genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background and Objectives: There is limited published evidence to guide the diagnosis and management of Methods: We used a modified Delphi process to systematically combine literature evidence with international experts' recommendations to determine best-practice clinical care guidelines in the areas of diagnosis, genetic testing, surveillance, and management. Results: Diagnosis: The diagnosis of ADLD should be considered in an individual with characteristic brain MRI findings and/or clinical symptoms of autonomic dysfunction, with or without a positive family history of autosomal dominant inheritance. The typical disease onset is insidious, followed by progression of manifestations.Genetic testing: The diagnosis of ADLD should be considered established in an individual with suggestive clinical and MRI findings, positive family history, and either a heterozygous pathogenic Discussion: Our consensus-based approach allowed us to formulate guideline recommendations in the setting of limited scientific evidence. Our analysis highlights the need for rigorous, collaborative studies on ADLD, including natural history studies, outcome assessments, and biomarker development, to improve our understanding and care of this devastating rare condition.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.