Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40933496›Full record

ArticleCirculation reports2025

Feasibility and Safety of Atrial Biopsy - Evidence From 1,000 Cases.

Toyokazu Otsubo, Kodai Shinzato, Takanori Yamaguchi, Kana Nakashima, Yuya Takahashi, Kotaro Tsuruta, Makoto Edayoshi, Shigeki Shichida, Ryosuke Osako, Yuki Nishimura and 14 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Circulation reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Toyokazu Otsubo *Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Saga University Saga Japan.
Kodai Shinzato *Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Saga University Saga Japan.
Takanori Yamaguchi *Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Saga University Saga Japan.
Kana NakashimaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Saga University Saga Japan.
Yuya TakahashiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Saga University Saga Japan.
Kotaro TsurutaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Saga University Saga Japan.
Makoto EdayoshiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Saga University Saga Japan.
Shigeki ShichidaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Saga University Saga Japan.
Ryosuke OsakoDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Saga University Saga Japan.
Yuki NishimuraDivision of Cardiology, Saga-ken Medical Centre Koseikan Saga Japan.
Yuki KawanoDivision of Cardiology, Saiseikai Futsukaichi Hospital Fukuoka Japan.
Kensuke YokoiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Saga University Saga Japan.
Akira FukuiDepartment of Cardiology and Clinical Examination, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University Oita Japan.
Kei HirotaDepartment of Cardiology and Clinical Examination, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University Oita Japan.
Masateru TakigawaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Institute of Science Tokyo Tokyo Japan.
Kai MiyazakiDepartment of Integrated Diagnostic Pathology, Nippon Medical School Tokyo Japan.
Yukako Shintani-DomotoDepartment of Integrated Diagnostic Pathology, Nippon Medical School Tokyo Japan.
Kaoru ItoLaboratory for Cardiovascular Genomics and Informatics, RIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences Yokohama Japan.
Shigehisa AokiDivision of Pathology, Department of Pathology and Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University Saga Japan.
Atsushi KawaguchiEducation and Research Center for Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University Saga Japan.
Seitaro NomuraDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, The University of Tokyo Tokyo Japan.
Tetsuo SasanoDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Institute of Science Tokyo Tokyo Japan.
Naohiko TakahashiDepartment of Cardiology and Clinical Examination, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University Oita Japan.
Koichi NodeDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Saga University Saga Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Atrial biopsy is technically challenging owing to the atria's thin walls and relatively thick endocardium. This study assessed the feasibility and safety of echocardiography-guided atrial biopsy in a consecutive cohort of 1,000 patients who underwent catheter ablation for atrial tachyarrhythmias or percutaneous left atrial (LA) appendage occlusion. Methods and Results: Atrial biopsy was performed at the limbus of the fossa ovalis through the femoral vein using a 5.5-Fr (n=233) or a 7.0-Fr (n=767) bioptome under intracardiac (n=963) or transesophageal (n=37) echocardiography guidance, alongside fluoroscopy. For histological analysis, 5 tissue samples were collected from the same site. Biopsy was successfully completed in 996 (99.6%) patients. Patients were divided based on histological depth into Group A (biopsy beyond the endocardium; n=885) and Group B (endocardial-only biopsy; n=111). Multivariable logistic regression identified larger LA volume, use of a 5.5-Fr bioptome, and amyloid deposition as independent predictors of Group B (P=0.009, P<0.001, and P=0.001, respectively). Moreover, biopsy-related complications were unrecorded. Conclusions: Echocardiography-guided atrial biopsy is a feasible and safe technique. However, atrial enlargement, smaller bioptome size, and amyloid deposition are associated with unsuccessful endocardial penetration and collection of myocardial tissue.

Indexed as

Atrial amyloidosisAtrial biopsyAtrial cardiomyopathyAtrial fibrillationCatheter ablation

Identifiers

PMID40933496
PMCPMC12419951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.