ReviewBladder (San Francisco, Calif.)2025
Applications and future prospects of laser technologies in the treatment of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.
Review in Bladder (San Francisco, Calif.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Bladder cancer (BCa) represents a common malignancy of the urinary system across the globe and poses significant treatment challenges. Objective: This review comprehensively examined the application of laser technology in the treatment of BCa, including thulium (Tm) lasers (e.g., Tm-doped yttrium aluminium garnet [YAG]), GreenLight lasers (e.g., potassium titanyl phosphate-doped YAG and lead aluminum borate-doped YAG), holmium lasers (e.g., Ho-doped YAG), Tm fiber laser (TFL), and diode lasers. Studies have demonstrated that laser technology effectively improves tumor resection quality, reduces intraoperative bleeding, shortens recovery time, and lowers recurrence rates. Among these, Ho-doped YAG and Tm-doped YAG lasers have been shown to reduce tissue damage and enhance resection precision, while the TFL has attracted attention for its efficient tissue cutting and minimal thermal damage. GreenLight lasers offer advantages in preserving surrounding healthy tissues and demonstrate potential for use in outpatient settings. Diode lasers, known for their high-energy efficiency, contribute to improved overall treatment efficacy. This article further explored the benefits, drawbacks, and prospective uses of each laser technology in BCa treatment. Conclusion: This article thoroughly reviewed the applications of various laser technologies in BCa treatment, highlight their benefits and limitations, and assess their potential roles in future clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.