Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40933475›Full record

ArticleBladder (San Francisco, Calif.)2025

Accuracy and limitations of ureteroscopic biopsy in the staging and grading of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A retrospective analysis at a large tertiary center.

Tran Ngoc An Huynh, Xinyi Wei, Samiha Arulshankar, James Huang, Nieroshan Rajarubendra, Kevin Chu, Matthew Harper, Scott Donnellan, Weranja Ranasinghe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bladder (San Francisco, Calif.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Tran Ngoc An HuynhDepartment of Urology, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria 3806, Australia.
Xinyi WeiDepartment of Urology, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria 3806, Australia.
Samiha ArulshankarDepartment of Urology, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria 3806, Australia.
James HuangDepartment of Urology, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria 3806, Australia.
Nieroshan RajarubendraDepartment of Urology, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria 3806, Australia.
Kevin ChuDepartment of Urology, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria 3806, Australia.
Matthew HarperDepartment of Urology, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria 3806, Australia.
Scott DonnellanDepartment of Urology, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria 3806, Australia.
Weranja RanasingheDepartment of Urology, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria 3806, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) poses significant diagnostic challenges due to the limitations of current staging and grading techniques. Ureteroscopic (URS) biopsy is widely used preoperatively, but its accuracy, compared to final pathology, remains variable. Objectives: To evaluate the accuracy and limitations of URS biopsy in the staging and grading of UTUC, using final pathological results from radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) as the reference standard. Methods: This retrospective study included 86 patients who underwent URS biopsy followed by RNU for UTUC at a tertiary institution between 2011 and 2023. Data were collected on patient demographics, tumor characteristics, imaging, and pathology results. The accuracy of URS biopsy in staging and grading was assessed, and its associations with pathological upstaging and non-diagnostic biopsies were statistically analyzed. Results: URS biopsy correctly staged 54.69% of tumors (κ = 0.311 [0.183 - 0.439], p<0.001) and correctly graded 70.93%. (κ = 0.447 [0.303 - 0.592], p<0.001). Pathological upstaging and upgrading occurred in 39.06% and 25.58% of cases, respectively. Non-diagnostic biopsies for both stage and grade were observed in 5.81% of cases, particularly in tumors located in the renal pelvis (p=0.0064). Complementary diagnostic tools, such as computed tomography urography (CTU) and urine cytology, showed limitations, with CTU detecting invasive disease in only 14.29% of cases and urine cytology identifying high-grade tumors in 11.11%. Conclusion: URS biopsy demonstrates limitations in accurately staging and grading UTUC, resulting in a risk of both undertreatment and overtreatment. A multimodal diagnostic approach incorporating imaging, cytology, and clinical judgment is essential to optimizing management decisions and improving oncological outcomes.

Indexed as

BiopsyDiagnostic accuracyRadical nephroureterectomyRenal pelvis tumorsTumor gradingTumor stagingUpper tract urothelial carcinomaUreteroscopy

Identifiers

PMID40933475
PMCPMC12417869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.