Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40933468›Full record

ArticleSurgery open science2025

Resident and faculty expectations for resident PGY performance for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

J S Broecker, S Lund, M Rivera, S McLaughlin, E Littleton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgery open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

J S BroeckerDepartment of Surgery, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL, United States.
S LundDepartment of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
M RiveraDepartment of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
S McLaughlinDepartment of Surgery, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL, United States.
E LittletonDepartment of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intro: Achieving competency is the main goal of surgical residency, but the best way to achieve and assess competency during training is evolving. While Entrusted Professional Activities (EPAs) were recently developed and nationally implemented to measure progressive levels of competency for surgery residents, little guidance exists regarding when residents should be given autonomy during specific steps of commonly performed procedures, such as laparoscopic cholecystectomy. We aimed to define faculty and resident expectations for the progression of resident autonomy while performing a laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods: An anonymous survey of faculty and residents at three hospitals was conducted. The survey asked what the lowest PGY faculty and residents individually expected residents to complete seven key steps of a laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Results: Residents and faculty generally agreed upon when residents should be competent in a step, except for clipping the cystic duct/artery (median expectation of PGY: resident = 2, Interquartile range (IQR) = [1,2] vs. faculty = 2, IQR = [2,3]; Conclusions: Residents and faculty generally agreed that residents should be competent in steps of LC prior to PGY3. Residents expected to be competent in clipping the cystic duct/artery and dissection of gallbladder at an earlier PGY compared to faculty.

Identifiers

PMID40933468
PMCPMC12417361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.