ArticleAsia Pacific allergy2025
More than ten years without changes in the prevalence of adverse food reactions among Mexican adults: Comparison of two cross-sectional surveys.
Article in Asia Pacific allergy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Adult Food Allergy Is an Under-Recognized Health Problem in Northwestern Mexico: A Population-Based Cross-Sectional Survey.Epidemiologia (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Some regions of the world have experienced increases in the prevalence of diseases such as asthma, allergic rhinitis, and atopic dermatitis; however, little is known about whether the same has occurred with the prevalence of adverse food reactions. Objective: To determine the temporal trend in the prevalence of adverse food reactions among adults in western Mexico. Methods: The results of 2 cross-sectional studies conducted 11 years apart (2012-2013 and 2023-2024) are compared. Data were obtained through a standardized survey administered to adults participating in physical activities in the "vía recreactiva" of Guadalajara and were included through stratified sampling based on sex and age. Results: The first and second studies included 471 and 485 adults, respectively. Comparatively, the prevalence of adverse food reactions was 19.5% and 19.4% ( Conclusion: Overall, the prevalence of adverse food reactions, their clinical manifestations, and the most implicated foods did not change during the analysis period. Sex, age, and atopic comorbidities were associated with adverse food reactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.