ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2025
Through the eyes of the patients: a qualitative study of diabetes patients' experiences navigating the healthcare system.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Beyond prescriptions: an analysis of patient journey, self-management adherence, and unmet needs in type 2 diabetes.BMC health services research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Experience maps of patient journeys offer valuable insights into efficient and cost-effective diabetes care that reflects the needs experienced by the patients. This study describes the diabetes patients' experience navigating the healthcare system. Methods: A phenomenological approach was adopted together with purposive sampling to achieve the study aim. One to one in-depth interviews were conducted with participants who had Type 2 diabetes (with and without diabetes related complications). A deductive thematic analysis was adopted for the study with data sufficiency achieved at thirteen interviews. Findings: Themes and codes were organized under three main stages: pre-diagnosis (stage 1), diagnosis and treatment (stage 2), and living with diabetes (stage 3). Stage 1 included themes for awareness and choice of care provider for initial care, and showed few care gaps, while stage 2 identified several service gaps and unmet needs. The themes that emerged included acceptance and life-facing diabetes and diabetes disease encounters, with several codes captured under the theme. Stage 3 included a theme for diabetes self-care. The usefulness of apps, good communication by the care team and facilitators of self-care were also mentioned. The major unmet needs perceived by the participant were patient-centeredness and personalized care in primary care settings. Conclusion: While the current diabetes care system was efficacious, areas for improvement exist, and patients expressed a desire for more patient-centered and personalized care, particularly in primary care settings. These findings offer valuable insights into T2DM management and highlight potential areas for enhancing healthcare delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.