ArticleFrontiers in physiology2025
Structure-guided deep learning for back acupoint localization via bone-measuring constraints.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- AI-enabled comprehensive patient safety management in acupuncture: from risk identification to continuous quality improvement.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate acupoint localization is crucial for the effectiveness of acupuncture and related Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) therapies. This study introduces a novel automated framework for recognizing back acupoints, uniquely integrating the traditional TCM bone-measuring principle with advanced deep learning for medical image analysis. The method employs an HRFormer backbone network combined with a Structure-Guided Keypoint Estimation Module (SG-KEM) and a structure-constrained loss function, ensuring anatomically consistent predictions within a standardized spatial coordinate system to improve accuracy across diverse body types. Trained and evaluated on a dataset of 430 high-resolution back images with 19 annotated acupoints, the framework achieved a normalized mean error (NME) of 0.6%, a failure rate (FR@1 cm) of 1.2%, an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.97, and a precision of 93.8%, while operating in real-time at 18 frames per second. Component analysis confirmed significant contributions: the SG-KEM module reduced the mean error by 33.3%, and the structure-constrained loss further decreased it to 0.6%. Moreover, ablation studies under challenging conditions validated the model's robustness. On the obese subset, the NME decreased from 1.5% to 0.8%, FR@1 cm dropped from 4.0% to 1.3%, and precision improved from 83.8% to 93.4%. Under illumination variation, the model achieved an NME of 0.9%, outperforming both HRFormer (1.3%) and HRFormer+SG-KEM (1.1%), with corresponding increases in AUC and precision. These findings demonstrate strong generalization across diverse clinical scenarios. Collectively, these results establish a clinically viable and computationally efficient solution for intelligent acupoint localization, supporting AI-assisted diagnosis and personalized treatment strategies within modern TCM healthcare systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.