Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40933302›Full record

ArticleNeurology. Clinical practice2025

Faculty Perspectives on Appreciation Strategies in a Neurology Department.

Sara W Hyman, Daniel N de Souza, Laura J Balcer, Steven L Galetta, Laurence R Gore, Jennifer Bickel, Neil A Busis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurology. Clinical practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sara W HymanDepartment of Neurology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9384-7718
Daniel N de SouzaDepartment of Neurology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York.
Laura J BalcerDepartments of Neurology, Population Health, and Ophthalmology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5136-4539
Steven L GalettaDepartments of Neurology and Ophthalmology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3781-7324
Laurence R GoreAdena Regional Medical Center, Chillicothe, OH; and.
Jennifer BickelUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Neil A BusisDepartment of Neurology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4603-4586

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Burnout is a pervasive occupational hazard for neurologists-undermining their well-being, jeopardizing patient safety and satisfaction, limiting access to care, and inflating health care costs. Well-designed appreciation and recognition practices may help mitigate some of its key drivers. This pilot study evaluates faculty perspectives on appreciation strategies in an academic neurology department. We used the Moffitt Provider Appreciation Assessment (MPAA), which assesses the types of appreciation methods respondents value, regardless of whether those practices are currently implemented in their workplace. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among full-time clinical faculty in the Department of Neurology at NYU Grossman School of Medicine. The survey included demographics, the MPAA, the single-item Mini-Z burnout inventory to assess self-reported burnout levels, and an intent-to-leave question. MPAA responses were analyzed for frequencies, and the association between burnout and intent to leave was examined. Results: Of the 202 faculty members, 77 (38%) participated. The most highly valued appreciation practices were inclusion in decision making (77%), efforts to reduce daily frustrations (75%), and positive feedback from patients and families (71%). Gifts, team celebrations with food, and public affirmations were among the least valued practices. Burnout symptoms were reported by 45% of respondents, and 30% indicated an intent to leave within 2 years. Higher burnout levels were associated with increased intent to leave ( Discussion: Neurology clinical faculty prioritized appreciation methods that directly address clinical work, underscoring the value of implementing tailored recognition practices that may reduce burnout. The methodology used in this pilot study can be adapted for broader application in other settings. After identifying faculty preferences, health care organizations can implement meaningful, transparent, and inclusive appreciation strategies that have the potential to strengthen physician relationships, promote well-being, and support a sustainable workforce.

Identifiers

PMID40933302
PMCPMC12418805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.