ArticleBrain communications2025
Replication of the 2023 radiologically isolated syndrome criteria in a multi-centre cohort.
Article in Brain communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Radiologically isolated syndrome (RIS) represents a pivotal stage for identifying individuals at high risk of transitioning into multiple sclerosis (MS). Early therapy initiation reduces the risk of conversion. The 2023-RIS criteria were proposed to identify presymptomatic individuals earlier. We aimed to replicate the diagnostic value of the 2023-RIS criteria in an independent cohort. In this retrospective cohort study, individuals diagnosed with RIS and longitudinally followed in three centres were stratified by the 2009- and 2023-RIS criteria. We conducted comparative analyses, including survival, hazard ratio and performance evaluations. Among
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.