Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40933269›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nuclear medicine2025

Quantification of FDG in the spinal cord using PET/MRI.

Eve Lennie, Steven Sourbron, Nigel Hoggard, Thomas Jenkins, Charalampos Tsoumpas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nuclear medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Eve LennieDivision of Clinical Medicine, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Steven SourbronDivision of Clinical Medicine, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Nigel HoggardDivision of Clinical Medicine, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Thomas JenkinsDivision of Clinical Medicine, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Charalampos TsoumpasDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In this study, we investigate the impact of MR-derived attenuation maps and limited detector resolution on the quantification of positron emission tomography (PET) activity uptake in the spinal cord during PET/MRI. This was performed by simulating [ Results: Simulation results showed a decreasing pattern of uptake from the cervical to the thoracic spinal cord. When bone was not included in attenuation correction, the mean uptake decreased by 3%-10.4%. This difference in measured uptake was 6.4%-23.9% in images simulated at a detector resolution representative of a clinical PET/MRI scanner. At a detector resolution of 4.4 mm, a 32.2% decrease in uptake was measured compared to the 2.1 mm simulation. In patient data, introducing vertebral bone to the attenuation correction pseudo-CT led to a 1.8%-18.3% difference in Conclusion: Ignoring bone during image reconstruction in PET/MRI reduces the activity measured during quantification of the spinal cord; however, the partial volume effect has a greater impact on reducing measured uptake in lower-resolution data. While time-of-flight correction goes somewhat resolves these quantification errors, further research is needed into partial volume correction.

Indexed as

magnetic resonance imagingneuroimagingneurologyPET/MRIpositron emission tomographyquantificationspinal cord

Identifiers

PMID40933269
PMCPMC12417479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.