ArticleFrontline gastroenterology2025
Liver transplant assessment for hepatocellular carcinoma: a single-centre experience.
Article in Frontline gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) continues to rise dramatically in the UK. Liver transplantation offers a potential cure and there is a large body of evidence demonstrating good outcomes. However, there is a paucity of data on the assessment, acceptance rates, and reasons for turning down liver transplantation in HCC. Methods: We undertook an analysis of all patients with HCC referred for liver transplant assessment to a tertiary liver centre between January 2015 and January 2020. Patient and tumour demographics, assessment outcomes and overall survival were analysed. Multivariate analysis was performed on factors affecting listing decisions. To evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, data collection was extended from March 2020 to March 2021. Results: Of 263 patients with HCC who completed liver transplant assessment, 168 (64%) were accepted for listing. The most common factors associated with a decision not to list a patient were medical comorbidities (n=50, 56.2% of those not listed) and rapid tumour progression (n=25, 26.3%). Of patients who were listed, 145 (86.4%) received a liver transplant. Five year survival from the time of transplant assessment was 68% with transplant and 12% without.The pandemic resulted in more patients progressing out of criteria after listing. Prepandemic median dropout per annum was 2% (0%-9%), compared with 25% during the pandemic study period. Conclusion: This study provides outcomes on patients with HCC referred for transplant assessment, identifying factors for non-listing and confirming the negative impact of decreased transplant activity during the pandemic on waiting list dropouts for HCC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.