ArticleEuropean journal of radiology open2025
Performance of an artificial intelligence tool for multi-step acute stroke imaging: A multicenter diagnostic study.
Article in European journal of radiology open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Role of AI-Based Software BrainScan in the Interpretation of Non-Contrast Head CT in Acute Ischemic Stroke: An External Validation Study.Neurology international · 2026Article
- Current State of the Clinical Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Stroke: A Literature Review.Brain sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Several artificial intelligence (AI) tools have been developed to assist in the stroke imaging workflow, which remains a major disease of the 21st century. This study evaluated the combined performance of an FDA-cleared and CE-marked AI-based device with three modules designed to detect intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), identify large vessel occlusion (LVO), and calculate Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Scores (ASPECTS). Materials & methods: Non-contrast CT (NCCT) and/or computed tomography angiography (CTA) for suspicion of stroke acquired at La Timone and Nord University hospitals (Marseille, France) between March 2019 and March 2020 were retrospectively collected. The AI tool, CINA-HEAD (Avicenna.AI), processed the data to flag ICH, LVO, and calculate ASPECTS. The results were compared to ground truth evaluations by four expert neuroradiologists to compute diagnostic performances. Results: A total of 373 NCCT and 331 CTA from 405 patients (mean age 64.9 ± 18.9 SD, 52.6 % female) were included. The AI tool achieved an accuracy of 94.6 % [95 % CI: 91.8 %-96.7 %] for ICH detection on NCCT and of 86.4 % [95 % CI: 82.2 %-89.9 %] for LVO identification on CTA. The region-based ASPECTS analysis yielded an accuracy of 88.6 % [95 % CI: 87.8 %-89.3 %] and the dichotomized ASPECTS classification (ASPECTS ≥ 6) achieved 80.4 % accuracy. Conclusion: This study demonstrates the reliable, stepwise performance of an AI-based stroke imaging tool across the diagnostic cascade of ICH and LVO detection and ASPECTS scoring. Such robust multi-stage evaluation supports its potential for streamlining acute stroke triage and decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.