ArticleLe infezioni in medicina2025
Impact of blood culture positivity on clinical outcomes in sepsis: a prospective observational study.
Article in Le infezioni in medicina, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Shapiro Decision Rule, Systemic Inflammatory Response Index, and Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index as Rapid Predictors of Bacteremia in Emergency Department Patients.Infection and drug resistance · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Bacteremia is usually considered a marker for severe infection, yet the correlation between blood culture positivity and mortality in sepsis remains uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate whether blood culture positivity is associated with adverse clinical outcomes in patients with sepsis. Methods: This prospective observational study included adult patients with sepsis admitted to a tertiary care hospital. Patients were classified into culture-positive and culture-negative groups based on blood culture results. Clinical outcomes including 30-day mortality, length of hospital stay, and vasopressor requirement were compared. Multivariable logistic and Cox regression models were used to assess the independent association of bacteremia with mortality, adjusting for age, and comorbidities. Results: Of 633 patients, 41.9% (n=265) were blood culture-positive. Although culture-positive patients had higher SOFA, SAPS II scores, and procalcitonin levels, 30-day mortality was similar between groups (20.8% vs. 26.1%; p=0.12). Length of hospital stay was comparable (median 14 vs. 16 days; p=0.374), as was ICU stay duration (p=0.693). On multivariable analysis, bacteremia was not independently associated with 30-day mortality (adjusted OR 0.62, 95% CI:0.28-1.37, p=0.236). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a non-significant trend toward higher survival in the culture-positive group (HR 1.30, 95% CI: 0.80-2.10, p=0.293). Conclusions: Although blood culture-positive sepsis was associated with higher disease severity at presentation, it did not result in increased 30-day mortality. These findings suggest that bacteremia alone does not determine sepsis outcomes, and culture-negative sepsis should be managed with equal clinical urgency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.