Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40933203›Full record

ArticlePsychedelic medicine (New Rochelle, N.Y.)2025

What is Psychological Support in the Context of Psychedelic Clinical Trials?

Jérémie Richard, Michael Levine

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychedelic medicine (New Rochelle, N.Y.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jérémie RichardCenter for Psychedelic & Consciousness Research, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9893-1353
Michael LevineCenter for Psychedelic & Consciousness Research, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The topic of psychological support and psychotherapy in the context of clinical investigations of psychedelic drugs is an often debated, yet predominantly unresolved issue in the field. Psychological support, as a concept, is poorly defined and there appears to be little agreement in the field regarding its essential components, boundaries and limits. While researchers have turned their attention to the role of placebo conditions and expectancy effects within the context of psychedelic clinical trials, the nature and role of psychological support remains difficult to define and capture. The objective of this perspective article is to provide a concrete description of the specific components, boundaries and limits of psychological support in comparison to psychotherapy based on the microskills framework established by Ivey et al. (2021). We propose that greater attention be placed on the specific communication units and behaviors that are considered psychological support or psychotherapy in the context of psychedelic clinical trials. Clinical trial protocols and treatment manuals should clearly define the psychosocial interventions and behaviors that fall within and outside of the scope of the trial to eliminate interventions that are not within the mandate of the specific trial or exceed the regulatory scope of practice of the session monitor(s).

Indexed as

clinical trialpsychedelicspsychological supportpsychotherapy

Identifiers

PMID40933203
PMCPMC12419150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.