ArticleLancet regional health. Americas2025
A nomogram to predict development of brain metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer patients: a retrospective analysis using routinely available medical records.
Article in Lancet regional health. Americas, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Brain metastases (BrM) are a frequent complication among patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). While guidelines exist for baseline CNS screening in advanced NSCLC, surveillance strategies for early-stage disease remain limited. This study aimed to develop a time-dependent BrM risk prediction nomogram using readily available clinical information. Methods: We analyzed a retrospective cohort of NSCLC patients at Penn State Health. Our objectives were to (1) systematically evaluate the performance of existing BrM risk prediction algorithms and (2) construct novel nomograms for BrM risk prediction in NSCLC. Using Cox-proportional hazard models with L1-regularization, we predicted BrM risk at 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year follow-up intervals. Findings: The patient cohort included 1904 patients (median age 68 years, range 38-94 years, BrM incidence 22.8%). The cohort included 1059 males (55.6%) and 845 females (44.4%). Of the cohort, 92.8% of patients identified as White (n = 1766), 1.0% as Asian (n = 19), 4.0% as Black (n = 77), and 2.2% as another race (n = 42). The Zhang 2021 model demonstrated the highest performance in predicting BrM incidence in our cohort, achieving an AUROC of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.87, 0.95). Two novel models were developed: a baseline model incorporating clinical and imaging data at diagnosis (cTNM stage, age at diagnosis), and an extended model including additional clinical and treatment data (number of extracranial metastatic sites, prior radiotherapy, chemotherapy, surgery, and histology) (https://nmikolajewicz.shinyapps.io/nomogram_wilding2024/). While both models showed similar short-term performance, the extended model demonstrated superior predictive capacity (AUROC 0.91 at 3-years) for longer-term outcomes. Our nomograms rely exclusively on clinical features routinely documented in patient records, thereby requiring no additional investigations. Interpretation: These clinically accessible nomograms for BrM prediction will facilitate prognostic modeling, risk stratification, refinement of CNS screening guidelines, and patient counseling. Funding: None.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.