ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2025
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Plant growth-promoting fungi (PGPF) play a fundamental role in plant development, such as nutrient acquisition and root growth. However, the growth promotion mechanisms regulated by Methods: We examined the growth-promoting effects of Aspergillus niger 129B on tomato plant root, stem, and leaf development through a combination of phenotype analyses and plant biomass measurement. Subsequently, molecular and genetic experiments were conducted to reveal the mechanism promoting root, stem, and leaf development. Results: It demonstrated that 129B significantly promoted the growth of tomato plants. Plant transcriptome and metabolome analysis revealed that this effect was associated with the plant hormone signaling pathway, particularly the expression of Discussion: Our findings concluded that 129B-induced plant promotion is dependent on the interaction between SAUR32 and PP2C72, providing novel insights into beneficial plant-microbiome interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.