ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2025
Biochemical properties of lactic acid bacteria for efficient silage production: an update.
Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bioactive Silages from Agro-Industrial By-Products Based on Grape Pomace or Olive Mill Wastewater for Ruminants: Evolution of Phenolic Profiles, Antioxidant Activity, and Fatty Acid Composition.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Metatranscriptomic insights into the effect ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Effects of Silage Inoculants on the Quality and Microbial Community of Whole-Plant Corn Silage Under Different Fertilization Treatments.Microorganisms · 2025Article
- Effect of Cellulase and Lactobacillus plantarum on the Quality, Microbial Composition, and Rumen Degradation Characteristics of Apple Pomace and Wheat Bran Mixed Silage.Animal science journal = Nihon chikusan GakkaihoArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ensiling, a microbial-driven process employed for preserving fresh forage in both bio-refineries and animal production, triggers significant biochemical transformations. These changes have spurred the exploration of novel silage additives, with a particular emphasis on the potential of microbial strains that exhibit superior biopreservation capabilities. Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) species have gained widespread recognition for their diverse applications as additives in the fermentation of crops and forage biomasses during ensiling. Nonetheless, recent variations in silage quality might be attributed to a lack of comprehensive information on the gene expression and molecular mechanisms of the microbiota involved in silage production. Contemporary research efforts have been directed toward uncovering nutrient-rich animal feed solutions through enhanced LAB inoculants. This review aims to shed light on the role of LAB inoculants in silage production and the modern biotechnological methods, including metabolomics, proteomics, metagenomics, genomics, transcriptomics, and genetic manipulation. These powerful tools are instrumental in the identification, enhancement, and development of high-performance LAB strains. Additionally, the review outlines emerging trends and prospective developments in LAB advancement for the enhancement of silage, which holds significant promise for breakthroughs in sustainable agriculture and improved animal feed production.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.