Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40933081›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Weakly supervised deep learning for multimodal MRI-TRUS registration: Toward assisting prostate biopsy guidance.

Jiabin Yu, Binggang Xiao, Jiayi Wang, Hongmei Mi, Enyu Wang, Ningjie Huang, You Zhou, Dongping Zhang, Furong Luo, Li Yang and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Jiabin YuDepartment of Artificial Intelligence, College of Information Engineering, China Jiliang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-9074-1665
Binggang XiaoDepartment of Artificial Intelligence, College of Information Engineering, China Jiliang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6920-101X
Jiayi WangDepartment of Artificial Intelligence, College of Information Engineering, China Jiliang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-0102-9767
Hongmei MiDepartment of Artificial Intelligence, College of Information Engineering, China Jiliang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-5398-4106
Enyu WangTaizhou Campus, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital (Taizhou Cancer Hospital), Taizhou, Zhejiang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-6357-5340
Ningjie HuangDepartment of Ultrasound, Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Zhangzhou, Fujian, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-8295-4589
You ZhouDepartment of Ultrasound, Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Zhangzhou, Fujian, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9474-9087
Dongping ZhangDepartment of Artificial Intelligence, College of Information Engineering, China Jiliang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6743-8945
Furong LuoDepartment of Ultrasound, Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Zhangzhou, Fujian, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-6409-5007
Li YangDepartment of Artificial Intelligence, College of Information Engineering, China Jiliang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1878-5013
Hanzong LinDepartment of Ultrasound, Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Zhangzhou, Fujian, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-2871-9837
Ruigang HuangDepartment of Ultrasound, Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Zhangzhou, Fujian, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-6250-6356
Yingying DingTaizhou Campus, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital (Taizhou Cancer Hospital), Taizhou, Zhejiang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-6195-4783
Xia LiDepartment of Artificial Intelligence, College of Information Engineering, China Jiliang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9429-1050
Chenjie XuDepartment of Artificial Intelligence, College of Information Engineering, China Jiliang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2377-1885
Guorong LyuDepartment of Ultrasound, Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Zhangzhou, Fujian, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3123-1138
Ming ChenDepartment of Ultrasound, Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Zhangzhou, Fujian, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-2942-4779

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Accurate magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound (MRI-TRUS) registration is essential for improving prostate cancer detection and biopsy guidance. This study presents a weakly supervised learning framework to enhance image alignment while minimizing reliance on extensive labeled data. Methods: We developed a two-stage weakly supervised framework integrating an attention-enhanced U-Net for prostate segmentation and a residual-enhanced registration network (RERN) for MRI-TRUS alignment. The segmentation model was trained and evaluated on public MRI datasets (MSD Prostate, Promise12, µ-RegPro) and TRUS datasets (µ-RegPro), with additional testing on a clinical cohort of 32 MRI-TRUS pairs. Performance was assessed using dice similarity coefficient (DSC), accuracy (Acc), precision (Pre), recall (Rec), and the 95th percentile Hausdorff distance (HD95). The registration model was trained and tested using MRI-TRUS pairs from µ-RegPro and the clinical cohort, with performance evaluated based on HD95 and target registration error (TRE). Additionally, clinical validation included PI-RADS-like grading, Likert confidence scoring, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to assess diagnostic impact. Results: The segmentation model demonstrated high accuracy (DSC: MRI 0.9154, TRUS 0.9384) and strong generalizability to clinical data (MRI 0.9010, TRUS 0.9173). The registration model achieved robust performance, with HD95 of 10.18 mm on public datasets and 11.18 mm on clinical data, and TRE below 8.64 mm. Clinical validation confirmed that registered MRI images preserved diagnostic integrity, as no significant differences were observed in radiologists' diagnostic performance (AUC: junior 0.706, senior 0.781, Conclusions: The proposed weakly supervised framework achieves high-precision MRI-TRUS registration with minimal annotation, ensuring strong generalizability and clinical applicability.

Indexed as

deep learningMRI-TRUS registrationmultimodal imagingprostate biopsyWeakly supervised learning

Identifiers

PMID40933081
PMCPMC12417678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.