ArticleDigital health
User or patient/human or person? Development of a practical framework for applying user-centered design to vulnerable populations for digital transformation in healthcare.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Application of AI in Hypertension Health Education: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Designing a digital tuberculosis treatment support and monitoring system for primary care: a user-centered qualitative study of patients, families, and healthcare workers.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Adopting a user-centred design approach for the development of on-device technology to prevent the viewing of child sexual abuse material: app design insights and principles from the development of 'Salus'.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Co-design rationales as living documents for reporting the exchange of experiential, professional and scientific perspectives in mental health care innovation.PLOS mental health · 2026Article
- Measurement of the impact of giant cell arteritis and treatment with glucocorticoids on health-related quality of life.Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2026Review
- Monitoring Atrial Fibrillation Using Wearable Digital Technologies: The Emerging Role of Smartwatches.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Digital healthcare services in the context of age-friendly community initiatives in China: a realist evaluation.BMC health services research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: User-centered design (UCD) is essential in developing healthcare technologies that effectively address user needs, particularly in vulnerable populations. Although UCD traditionally emphasizes direct user involvement, challenges arise when individuals face cognitive, emotional, or structural barriers to participation. In medical settings, integrating UCD with inclusive design principles has been crucial to ensuring equitable healthcare solutions. Methods: Based on our expertise and a narrative review, we identified challenges and results in UCD approaches in digital health. Results: The findings reveal key principles for applying UCD in digital health, emphasizing the importance of early user engagement, accessibility, and interdisciplinary collaboration. Studies demonstrate that active involvement of end-users (patients, healthcare providers, and caregivers) through qualitative methods such as interviews, surveys, and usability testing, ideally following iterative design cycles, is critical for designing effective and inclusive digital tools. Accessibility considerations, particularly for vulnerable populations, and integration of digital tools into clinical workflows play an essential role in the process. Conclusion: To address these challenges, we propose a structured UCD framework for "user-patient-human-friendly" digital transformation in healthcare that guides the development of digital health technologies from initial user research to long-term evaluation. The framework provides a roadmap for designing solutions that are adaptable, inclusive, and sustainable, ensuring that healthcare technologies align with the needs of diverse populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.