ArticleJournal of hand surgery global online2025
Individualization of Donor Nerve Selection With Intraoperative Nerve Monitoring in Axillary Nerve Neurotization.
Article in Journal of hand surgery global online, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Intraoperative Nerve Action Potential Amplitude and Functional Recovery After Selective Ulnar-to-Musculocutaneous Nerve Transfer (Oberlin Technique).Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the use of intraoperative nerve conduction studies in radial to axillary nerve transfers using the motor branches to the triceps. We hypothesized that morphological characteristics might not fully express a donor nerve's suitability for transfer and that choosing the donor branch based on nerve action potential (NAP) amplitudes would lead to better functional outcomes. Methods: This retrospective analysis included 17 patients who underwent radial to axillary nerve transfer. The specific triceps motor branch used as donor and the site of neurorrhaphy were chosen based on intraoperative NAP amplitudes independently of morphological criteria, such as size matching or arc of rotation. Results: We found a moderate correlation between the NAP amplitude of the transferred branch and shoulder abduction strength at the end of the follow-up. The branch to the lateral head of the triceps was the most often selected as a donor. Outcomes were satisfactory in 14 out of 17 patients. Conclusions: The findings suggest that reinnervation is enhanced when the choice of the donor branch is individualized and based on functional metrics like NAP, instead of anatomical characteristics. The study supports the role of intraoperative nerve monitoring as an objective and predictable method to refine donor branch selection in radial to axillary nerve transfer. Type of study/level of evidence: Therapeutic IV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.