Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40933058›Full record

ArticleResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2025

Antithrombotic therapy after cardiac valve surgery: prospective real-world data of Class II guidelines application and outcomes from the EURObservational Research Programme Valvular Heart Disease II survey.

Bram Roosens, Bernard Iung, Julia Mascherbauer, Susanna Price, Cécile Laroche, Jean-Luc Monin, Hüseyin Ince, Steven Droogmans, Bernard Cosyns, EURObservational Research Programme Valvular Heart Disease II Investigators Group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Bram RoosensCentrum voor Hart- en Vaatziekten, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Bernard IungBichat Hospital, Avicenne and Bichat Hospitals, Laboratoire de recherche vasculaire translationnelle INSERM, Université Paris-Cité, Paris, France.
Julia MascherbauerDivision of Internal Medicine 3, University Hospital St. Pölten, St. Pölten, Austria.
Susanna PriceDepartment of Cardiology and Intensive Care, Royal Brompton and Harefield National Health Service Foundation Trust, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK.
Cécile LarocheEURObservational Research Programme, European Society of Cardiology, Biot, France.
Jean-Luc MoninDepartment of Cardiology, Henri Mondor Hospital, Créteil, France.
Hüseyin InceDepartment of Cardiology, Vivantes Klinikum Am Urban and Neukölln, Berlin, Germany.
Steven DroogmansCentrum voor Hart- en Vaatziekten, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Bernard CosynsCentrum voor Hart- en Vaatziekten, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
EURObservational Research Programme Valvular Heart Disease II Investigators Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Antithrombotic therapy (AT) after cardiac valve surgery is complex, with guidelines often relying on limited evidence. Objectives: This study examines real-world adherence to the European Society of Cardiology Class II, level C recommendations for AT in valve surgery, as well as the 6-month impact of AT on patient outcomes. Methods: This prospective, observational subanalysis of the European Society of Cardiology EURObservational Research Programme Valvular Heart Disease II survey included 6 substudies examining different valve interventions and AT regimens. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and 6-month outcomes were compared between groups receiving the recommended AT and those who did not. Results: Guideline adherence varied widely (39.5%-81.1%) across substudies. Factors influencing AT decisions included cardiovascular risk factors, atrial fibrillation, and prior percutaneous coronary intervention. In unadjusted analyses of 3 substudies, 6-month all-cause mortality was significantly higher in patients not receiving the recommended AT. However, no significant differences were observed in thromboembolic events, bleeding, or other complications between AT and non-AT groups across all substudies at 6 months. Conclusion: This analysis reveals potential mortality benefits associated with guideline-recommended AT in some patient groups. However, the observational nature of the study limits causal inferences, emphasizing the importance of further prospective research to optimize AT strategies and improve patient outcomes in this complex clinical setting, particularly as new AT and valve types emerge.

Indexed as

anticoagulationantiplatelet therapycardiac valve surgeryregistryvalve disease

Identifiers

PMID40933058
PMCPMC12419113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.