ArticleResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2025
Antithrombotic therapy after cardiac valve surgery: prospective real-world data of Class II guidelines application and outcomes from the EURObservational Research Programme Valvular Heart Disease II survey.
Article in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Antithrombotic therapy (AT) after cardiac valve surgery is complex, with guidelines often relying on limited evidence. Objectives: This study examines real-world adherence to the European Society of Cardiology Class II, level C recommendations for AT in valve surgery, as well as the 6-month impact of AT on patient outcomes. Methods: This prospective, observational subanalysis of the European Society of Cardiology EURObservational Research Programme Valvular Heart Disease II survey included 6 substudies examining different valve interventions and AT regimens. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and 6-month outcomes were compared between groups receiving the recommended AT and those who did not. Results: Guideline adherence varied widely (39.5%-81.1%) across substudies. Factors influencing AT decisions included cardiovascular risk factors, atrial fibrillation, and prior percutaneous coronary intervention. In unadjusted analyses of 3 substudies, 6-month all-cause mortality was significantly higher in patients not receiving the recommended AT. However, no significant differences were observed in thromboembolic events, bleeding, or other complications between AT and non-AT groups across all substudies at 6 months. Conclusion: This analysis reveals potential mortality benefits associated with guideline-recommended AT in some patient groups. However, the observational nature of the study limits causal inferences, emphasizing the importance of further prospective research to optimize AT strategies and improve patient outcomes in this complex clinical setting, particularly as new AT and valve types emerge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.