ArticleREC, interventional cardiology2025
Left atrial appendage occlusion plus oral anticoagulation in stroke patients despite ongoing anticoagulation: rationale and design of the ADD-LAAO clinical trial.
Article in REC, interventional cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recurrent Stroke Following Left Atrial Appendage Closure in Patients with Breakthrough Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion vs. Oral Anticoagulants: Current Evidence and Debates.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Decoding the causes of ischemic stroke despite ongoing oral anticoagulation and their clinical impact: the ASPERA-R study.Journal of neurology · 2026Article
- All for one or one for all!REC, interventional cardiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction and objectives: The prevalence of atrial fibrillation and the number of patients experiencing ischemic strokes despite oral anticoagulation (OAC) are both on the rise, which presents a significant challenge due to the absence of clear and uniform treatment recommendations for these patients. To date, there is no formal combination merging into a high anticoagulant efficacy profile while keeping a low bleeding risk. Transcatheter left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) in combination with OAC might provide a balance between safety and efficacy. The objective of this study is to evaluate whether, in ischemic stroke patients, despite anticoagulation, the combination of LAAO plus long-term anticoagulation-direct oral anticoagulants or vitamin K antagonist when indicated-is associated with a lower rate of recurrent cardioembolic events at 12 months vs the optimal medical therapy recommended by the neurologist. Methods: A total of 380 patients with ischemic stroke despite OAC will be included. Patients will be randomized on a 1:1 ratio to receive the optimal medical therapy (control) or the combination of LAAO plus OAC or OAC. The primary endpoint of the study will be the occurrence of a cardioembolic event-ischemic stroke or arterial peripheral embolism-within the first 12 months after inclusion. Conclusions: This study is one of the first randomized clinical trials to compare the LAAO plus OAC combination and optimal medical therapy in patients who have experienced ischemic strokes despite being on OAC. If results confirm the superiority of LAAO plus OAC, it could lead to a paradigm shift in treatment guidelines for these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.