ArticleREC, interventional cardiology2025
Early discharge following transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a feasible goal during the learning curve?
Article in REC, interventional cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Fast-track TAVI: establishing a new standard of care.REC, interventional cardiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction and objectives: Although early discharge protocols after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) have demonstrated to be safe in various studies, they are usually applied in high-experience centers. This study analyzes the length of stay of the first 100 patients undergoing TAVI in a center without on-site cardiac surgery, differentiating between very early (< 24 hours), early (24-48 hours), and late discharge (> 48 hours). Furthermore, the study evaluates the feasibility of an early discharge protocol during the team's learning curve. Methods: We conducted a prospective observational study from April 2022 through January 2024. A pre- and postoperative management protocol was implemented, including assessments in the Valvular Heart Disease Clinic, admission to the cardiac surgery intensive care unit with electrocardiographic monitoring, and specific discharge criteria in full compliance with an established protocol for the management of conduction disorders. Early follow-up evaluations were performed in the outpatiently after discharge. Results: A total of 100 patients (50% women) were included, with a mean age of 82.4 ± 5.3 years and a EuroSCORE II score of 4.38 ± 5.1%. The median length of stay was 2 days (range, 1-19). A total of 27.27% of patients were discharged in < 24 hours, 48.49% within the 24-48 hours following implantation, and 24.24% 48 hours later. The 30-day cardiovascular mortality rate was 1%. A total of 6 patients were readmitted with procedural complications within the first 30 days. Conclusions: The implementation of a standardized care protocol allows for early and safe discharge in most patients, even during the team's learning cuve.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.