Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40932978›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Knowledge, Attitude, Awareness, and Practice Regarding the Use of Interdental Aids Among Dental Professionals and Students: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Huda H Mohamed, Hana M Ghaith, Sara Mohamed A M Bogazia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Huda H MohamedDepartment of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Benghazi, Benghazi, LBY.
Hana M GhaithDepartment of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Benghazi, Benghazi, LBY.
Sara Mohamed A M BogaziaDepartment of Oral Biology, Ajdabiya University, Ajdabiya, LBY.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionInterdental aids are necessary to effectively clean between the teeth by removing biofilms. Students and professionals play a crucial role in oral health promotion. Their attitude, knowledge, and behavior indicate how well they take care of their teeth and motivate patients to follow good oral health habits. The aim of this study was to assess dental professionals' and students' knowledge, attitude, awareness, and practice regarding the use of interdental aids and also to identify whether dental education helps to increase their knowledge, attitude, and practice about the use of interdental aids.

methodsAn online survey using a 15-item questionnaire with four sections was carried out. This was performed using Google Forms to assess the knowledge and use of interdental aids by 237 Libyan dental students and professionals.

resultsThe respondents included 174 female respondents (73.4%), and 127 of them (53.6%) were aged between 20 and 30 years. Most participants were practicing in Benghazi (152; 64.1%) and represented all educational levels, from first-year students to PhD graduates. A total of 225 subjects (94.9%) knew about interdental aids. The specialist and postgraduate groups showed significantly higher identification of health benefits compared to the younger groups (p = 0.005).

conclusionsOverall awareness and knowledge of interdental aids were high and increased with the level of education but also had gaps, especially among less experienced trainees. During dental education and professional development, special education programs can promote the use of standardized and efficient interdental hygiene procedures and improve the oral health of their patients.

Indexed as

attitudedental professionalsdental studentsinterdental cleaning aidsknowledgeoral hygiene

Identifiers

PMID40932978
PMCPMC12417094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.