ArticleCureus2025
Fertility Preservation Among Patients With Breast Cancer: A Qualitative Study of Patient and Healthcare Provider Perspectives.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Decision-making and psychological outcomes in women with breast cancer: Insights into the choice against fertility preservation and implications for supportive care.PEC innovation · 2026Article
- Review
- Fertility preservation in women with cancer: shared decision-making and the essential role of nurses.Women's health nursing (Seoul, Korea) · 2025Article
- Shared Decision-Making on Fertility Preservation in Reproductive-Aged Women with Gynecological Cancer: A Qualitative Study of Patients' and Health Care Professionals' Perspectives.International journal of women's health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aim of this study is to explore barriers impacting the decision about pursuing fertility preservation (FP) among women in the reproductive age group diagnosed with breast cancer before beginning cancer treatment at the patient, healthcare provider, and healthcare system levels from both patients' and healthcare providers' perspectives.
methodsA qualitative study design was performed with a phenomenological approach using semi-structured interviews at a regional cancer institute providing specialty care for breast cancer. The total sample size was thirteen, including eight oncology healthcare providers and five patients with breast cancer.
resultsPrevalent patient-level barriers included (i) financial constraints, (ii) lack of knowledge about FP, and (iii) fear of delay in cancer treatment. Patient-level barriers, as perceived by physicians, also highlighted the financial burden and the overwhelming news of a cancer diagnosis when treatment often takes priority. Common healthcare provider-level barriers were (i) time constraints to independently coordinate a referral process, (ii) limited specialized knowledge about FP, and (iii) assumptions about patients' fertility needs. Finally, the health system-level barriers included a lack of (i) a pre-determined referral pathway for FP and (ii) accessible information about existing resources.
conclusionsDespite longstanding recognition of barriers to FP among patients with cancer, challenges persist, particularly in regional healthcare settings. Our findings highlight the need for a multi-level approach to enhance FP care for breast cancer survivors, including implementing automated referral systems, enhancing provider education on FP, and addressing financial barriers through targeted policy actions. These strategies could ensure equitable access to FP services and improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.