ReviewWorld journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery2025
Using a customizable L stent for laryngotracheal stenosis: Patterns of success and failure.
Review in World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Using a customizable L stent for laryngotracheal stenosis: Patterns of success and failure.World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: A recent innovation in the management of tracheostomy-dependent patients with laryngotracheal stenosis (LTS) has been the customizable laryngotracheal stent, made by dividing a T-tube in half ("L stent"). These L stents can be placed into the subglottis as well as the posterior glottis to prevent rapid re-stenosis following surgery, and they are easily removed in the office. We sought to review our experience with these stents and analyze patterns of success and failure. Methods: Retrospective chart review was performed of all tracheostomy-dependent patients who underwent L stent placement from January 2019 through February 2024. Clinical and demographic data were reviewed, with decannulation as the primary endpoint. Patients were assessed as having comorbid conditions (diabetes, coronary artery disease, morbid obesity, prior radiation) or not. Results: A total of 16 patients underwent stent placement. Six patients had posterior glottic stenosis (PGS), six had subglottic stenosis (SGS), and four had multilevel stenosis. Of these 16 patients, 9 were ultimately decannulated (56.2%). Three of the successes were PGS (33.3%), four were SGS (44.4%), and two had both SGS and PGS (22.2%). Patients who were decannulated were statistically less likely to have comorbid conditions than patients who failed decannulation ( Conclusion: For tracheostomy-dependent patients who have failed first-line therapy, endoscopic surgery paired with L stent placement offers a reasonable alternative to open airway reconstruction or more destructive arytenoidectomy or cordotomy procedures. As with most airway surgeries, patient selection is important, as the presence of multilevel stenosis and/or comorbid conditions can predict a higher failure rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.