ArticleWorld journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery2025
Academic productivity and industry trends of fellowship-trained U.S. academic rhinologists.
Article in World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Academic productivity and industry trends of fellowship-trained U.S. academic rhinologists.World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Academic productivity is believed to be correlated with years of experience and departmental rank, yet there is a paucity of granular academic data between rhinology faculty regarding departmental rank and industry engagement, and how these relate to experience. Objective: To examine the interrelationships between experience, department rank and reputation, funding, industry engagement, and academic output of rhinology faculty. Methods: Demographics, academic metrics (publications, citations, h-index, National Institutes of Health [NIH] funding), program rankings, and industry compensation for academic U.S. rhinologists through June 2022 were collected and compared between academic rank and years of experience. Results: A cohort of 278 rhinologists were included. Full professors had greater academic metrics (all Conclusions: Although early career rhinologists published more frequently, ascending professorial rank, years of experience, and affiliation with top-ranked departments were associated with total academic productivity. Industry engagement was linked to reputation and years of experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.