ArticleJournal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma2025
Navigating the AI frontier: Balancing efficiency and integrity in orthopaedic peer review.
Article in Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rise of artificial intelligence (AI) in orthopaedic peer review brings a mix of exciting possibilities and serious concerns. On one hand, AI tools can streamline the manuscript evaluation process, making it quicker and more efficient. On the other hand, we must navigate significant risks that could compromise the integrity of reviews, such as confidentiality breaches and AI's potential to amplify existing biases. This editorial explores how AI affects the core responsibilities of peer reviewers, highlighting the vital importance of human oversight, transparency, and adaptability to ensure that our commitment to high-quality, rigorous orthopaedic research remains intact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.