ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2025
Pupil adjustments to illusory perceptions of the light intensity of object surfaces.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Using infrared eye tracking, we show that when gaze is maintained at the center of one of two equiluminant surfaces of a Cornsweet stimulus, designed by Lotto and Purves, that illusorily appear to be lighter or darker than the other, the eye pupils constrict or dilate, respectively. That is, pupil sizes mirror the subjective experience of differential brightness. Previous studies of pupil responses to illusions of light had focused on illusions of unveridical light sources (e.g., patterns resembling the sun), whereas in the present study, we show pupil adjustments to the illusory brightness of object surfaces within images of realistic scenes. In two control experiments, we also showed that when the edge gradients of the Cornsweet stimulus, which do differ in luminance, were either occluded or presented alone in a black field, there were no differences in pupil diameters. We also conclude that adjustments to the perception of surface reflectance are unlikely to represent anticipatory responses to probable risks of temporary visual impairment (i.e., dazzle to sunlight) and, instead, indicate that a gradual process of disambiguation of the visual scene is sufficient to elicit adjustments to the apparent light intensity of an object's surface.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.