Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40932880›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2025

Pupil adjustments to illusory perceptions of the light intensity of object surfaces.

Bruno Laeng, Hüseyin Berke Canoluk, Shoaib Nabil

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bruno LaengDepartment of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Hüseyin Berke CanolukDepartment of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Shoaib NabilDepartment of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using infrared eye tracking, we show that when gaze is maintained at the center of one of two equiluminant surfaces of a Cornsweet stimulus, designed by Lotto and Purves, that illusorily appear to be lighter or darker than the other, the eye pupils constrict or dilate, respectively. That is, pupil sizes mirror the subjective experience of differential brightness. Previous studies of pupil responses to illusions of light had focused on illusions of unveridical light sources (e.g., patterns resembling the sun), whereas in the present study, we show pupil adjustments to the illusory brightness of object surfaces within images of realistic scenes. In two control experiments, we also showed that when the edge gradients of the Cornsweet stimulus, which do differ in luminance, were either occluded or presented alone in a black field, there were no differences in pupil diameters. We also conclude that adjustments to the perception of surface reflectance are unlikely to represent anticipatory responses to probable risks of temporary visual impairment (i.e., dazzle to sunlight) and, instead, indicate that a gradual process of disambiguation of the visual scene is sufficient to elicit adjustments to the apparent light intensity of an object's surface.

Indexed as

brightnessCornsweet effectillusionlightnessluminancepupillometrysurfaces

Identifiers

PMID40932880
PMCPMC12418116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.