ReviewFrontiers in human neuroscience2025
Integrating music and nature: a scoping review of research on interventions involving both music- and nature-based strategies for mental health and wellbeing.
Review in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Both music-related and nature-based therapeutic activities can enhance wellbeing, physical, social, emotional, and mental health, and recovery from posttraumatic stress. While music- and nature-based therapeutic approaches have been studied individually, research is limited on the holistic combination of music- and nature-based therapeutic interventions. Thus, a scoping review was conducted to chart primary research on the combined use of music- and nature-based therapeutic strategies and their effects on overall wellbeing, and within this scope, potentially on mental and behavioral health outcomes. Methods: Included were peer-reviewed articles reporting primary research findings on how (if at all) the combined use of both music and nature-based interventions impacted wellbeing and thus, mental and behavioral health. All studies had to be reported in English. Excluded were studies that did not involve both nature-based and music-related therapeutic activities, those not involving primary research, and articles without a clear discussion on potential impacts on wellbeing, mental, or behavioral health. After applying this inclusion and exclusion criteria, 884 potentially relevant peer-reviewed articles were identified, 23 of which were preliminarily screened in upon abstract and title review. After full text reading, eight of these articles were deemed eligible for the review and were thematically analyzed. Results: Four themes were identified from the reviewed studies: (a) music- and nature-based activities yield benefits across various aspects of wellbeing, (b) multiple activities can be combined and adapted for diverse contexts and populations, (c) more research is needed on the combined therapeutic use of music and nature, and (d) choice and expression should be prioritized, which music and nature can facilitate. The primary focus of the reviewed studies was on how music-based interventions in outdoor or natural settings can impact multiple aspects of wellbeing, particularly emotional wellbeing, and with this, improved mood. Discussion: The results suggest that combining music and nature-based therapeutic approaches can improve mental and behavioral health by enhancing multiple aspects of wellbeing. For example, music-making in natural settings can foster deep connections with nature and spiritual wellness. Implications for future research are provided, as further research is needed on the combined use of music- and nature-based therapeutic activities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.