ArticleJCRS online case reports2025
Intracorneal hypopyon within a DSAEK graft.
Article in JCRS online case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Intracorneal hypopyon is a rare condition involving the accumulation of inflammatory cells and debris within the structures of the cornea. We present an unusual case of an intracorneal hypopyon within a Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) graft. Patient and Clinical Findings: A 54-year-old woman status post DSAEK for bullous keratopathy secondary to prior trabeculectomy and cataract surgery developed a corneal ulcer. Corneal cultures grew Diagnosis Intervention and Outcomes: Anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) identified an intracorneal hypopyon between the Descemet membrane and corneal stroma of the DSAEK graft. Antibiotics were continued, while topical steroids, initially reduced in response to infection, were increased modestly. The patient's condition and hypopyon gradually improved. Conclusions: Ophthalmologists should consider the possibility of an intracorneal hypopyon masquerading as a persistent stromal infiltrate in the setting of infectious keratitis. Unlike unresponsive corneal infiltrates, intracorneal hypopyons may represent sterile inflammatory debris after resolved infection. AS-OCT was critical to distinguish the intracorneal hypopyon from a persistent infiltrate, which may have prevented unnecessary and/or invasive interventions.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.